Ilish or Hilsa is the national fish of Bangladesh. It is a very tasty
and delicious fish. Its natural habitat is the estuaries or the seas. But for breeding purposes it has to come to the upstream or rivers.
Once, this fish was abundantly available in the river Padma near Rajshahi. But because of the construction of the Farraka Barrage in the upstream there has been the less flow of water in the Padma and as a result there has been the dearth of turbidity, depth and water current. So this marine or estuarine fish does not ascend the upstream for breeding in this line. At present the main hilsa landing centres are Chandpur, Chittagong and Barisal. The scientific name of this fish is Hilsa Ilisha (Hamilton –Buchanan, 1822).
There are three species of this fish such as H. ilisha, H. keele and H. toil. Of all these 3 species only H. ilisha comes to the upstream of the river Padma, Meghna or Jamuna for breeding. All other species of Hilsa i.e. H. toli and H. keele are marine. There is another species of hilsa known as Tenualosa ilisha but this species is found in the middle or mid region of the Bay of Bengal near Sri Lanka. These two fishes i.e. Hilsa ilisha and Tenualosa ilisha resemble each other but the only morphological difference is that H. ilisha is spotless and the whole body is smooth while the body of T. ilisha is spotted dorsolaterally. There are 6-7 elongated spots in this fish. (Fig-1). All other genera and species of hilsa are marine and they also breed in marine environment. There was no controversy regarding the naming or nomenclature of this hilsa or ilish fish till 1970s. The controversy arose when Shafi and Quddus (1982) described this freshwater/Ganges/Padma river shad as Tenualosa ilisha. They without giving taxonomic keys described it as T. ilisha, probably following Whitehead (1965, 1985) who in the name of revision described this freshwater shad as T. ilisha. Now let us see scientifically which name is valid for this fish.
The specific name of this fish ilisha was first proposed by Hamilton-Buchanan in 1822. Later on Cuvier in 1878 and Hamilton-Buchanan (1822) named it as Clupea ilisha. The fish was also named as Clupanodon ilisha by Lacepede (Hamilton-Buchanan, 1822). Regan (1917) found that this fish is different from other marine hilsas. So the generic names Clupea, and Clupanodon were retained for other marine fishes. He proposed the generic name Hilsa for this freshwater Gangetic shad. Fowler (1934) proposed the generic name for this fish as Tenualosa. Munro (1955) described the marine and freshwater hilsa fish of Ceylon as Tenualosa ilisha. Bhuiyan (1964) described this fish as Hilsa ilisha. He also mentioned in his book that Munro named this fish as Tenualosa ilisha collected from the marine and freshwater environment of Ceylon. Bhuiyan et al. (1992) described the fish as H. ilisha. All other authors of the sub continent such as Alikhunhi, Hora, Nazir Ahmed, Jhingran (1975), Rahman (1989), Talwar and Jhingran (1991) described the fish as Hilsa ilisha. Rahman (2005) in the revised edition of his book mentioned this fish as Tenualosa ilisha, probably following Whitehead (1965, 1985). The freshwater shad i.e. hilsa is spotless and the whole body is smooth while in Tenualosa there are 6-7 dorsolateral elongated spots (Fig-1). These two are distinct species. If Shafi and Quddus; Rahman and Whitehead want to accept this freshwater shad as Tenualosa by discarding Hilsa then what is the other fish for which this Hilsa name has been retained? Because the name Hilsa was first proposed by Regan in 1917 and Tenualosa by Fowler in 1934. So according to the law of priority the name Hilsa remains valid and Tenualosa is discardable since both these names are given to the same fish. I have collected few individuals of Tenualosa ilisha from Rajshahi fish market which were caught along with Hilsa ilisha. Probably these fishes migrated towards the north of the Bay of Bengal and caught along with H. ilisha.
Here I want to mention that our major carp rui was once named as Cyprinus rohita. But when it was found that Cyprinus is a distinct genus of European carp which is different from our rui fish so later on it was named as Labeo rohita. But Cyprinus genus was not discarded; it has been retained for the Euroean major carps. The genus Hilsa can not be discarded since it is not retained for other fish. The genus Tenualosa is to be discarded since it was proposed later by Fowler, Munro retained this genus for Srilankan ilish. He did not find any fish of the genus Hilsa in Sri Lanka. So in conclusion we should say that the scientific name of Tenualosa ilisha is the spotted Sri Lankan ilish. Bangladesh national fish ilish is Hilsa ilisha and not Tenualosa ilisha.
and delicious fish. Its natural habitat is the estuaries or the seas. But for breeding purposes it has to come to the upstream or rivers.
Once, this fish was abundantly available in the river Padma near Rajshahi. But because of the construction of the Farraka Barrage in the upstream there has been the less flow of water in the Padma and as a result there has been the dearth of turbidity, depth and water current. So this marine or estuarine fish does not ascend the upstream for breeding in this line. At present the main hilsa landing centres are Chandpur, Chittagong and Barisal. The scientific name of this fish is Hilsa Ilisha (Hamilton –Buchanan, 1822).
As food
Panta Ilish - a
traditional platter of congee with fried Ilish slice, supplemented with dried fish (Shutki),
pickles (Achar), dal, green chillies and onion - is a popular serving
for the Pohela Boishakh festival.
Shorshe Ilish, a dish of
smoked ilish with mustard seeds, has been an important part of Bengali
cuisine.
Ilish is an oily fish
rich in essential fatty acids(omega 3 fatty acids). Recent experiments have
shown its beneficial effects in decreasing cholesterol level in ratsand insulin
level. In Bengal,
ilish can be smoked, fried, steamed, baked in young plantain
leaves, prepared with mustard seed paste, curd, Begun
(eggplant), different condiments like jira and so on. It is said
that people can cook ilish in more than 50 ways. Ilish roe is also popular as a
side dish. Ilish can be cooked in very little oil since the fish itself is very
oily.
In North
America (where Ilish is not always readily available) the shad fish is sometimes
used as a Ilish substitute, especially in Bengali cuisine. This typically
occurs near the East coast of North America, where fresh shad can be fished.
The substitution is possible because of the fairly similar flavour and
consistency of these two fish.
Ilish in culture
In many Hindu
Bengali families two Ilish fishes (Joda Ilish) are bought on special
auspicious days, like some pujas.
It is considered auspicious to buy two Ilish fishes on the day of Saraswati Puja
(The Goddess of Learning and Beauty), which takes place in the beginning of
Spring and also on the day of Lakshmi Puja
(The Goddess of Wealth and Prosperity) which takes place in autumn. But this
custom is prevalent mainly among the Hindu Bengalis of former East Bengal (now
Bangladesh) many of whom now live in West Bengal, Barak Valley
(Assam)
and Tripura
in India after the Partition of India. Some of them give Ilish
fish as an offering to the goddess Lakshmi, without which the Puja is sometimes
thought to be incomplete.
There are also
several jokes involving Bangal (those from East Bengal) and Ghotis(traditionally
from West Bengal) where the Bangals love Ilish and the Ghoti love Ching-ri (Prawns).
There are three species of this fish such as H. ilisha, H. keele and H. toil. Of all these 3 species only H. ilisha comes to the upstream of the river Padma, Meghna or Jamuna for breeding. All other species of Hilsa i.e. H. toli and H. keele are marine. There is another species of hilsa known as Tenualosa ilisha but this species is found in the middle or mid region of the Bay of Bengal near Sri Lanka. These two fishes i.e. Hilsa ilisha and Tenualosa ilisha resemble each other but the only morphological difference is that H. ilisha is spotless and the whole body is smooth while the body of T. ilisha is spotted dorsolaterally. There are 6-7 elongated spots in this fish. (Fig-1). All other genera and species of hilsa are marine and they also breed in marine environment. There was no controversy regarding the naming or nomenclature of this hilsa or ilish fish till 1970s. The controversy arose when Shafi and Quddus (1982) described this freshwater/Ganges/Padma river shad as Tenualosa ilisha. They without giving taxonomic keys described it as T. ilisha, probably following Whitehead (1965, 1985) who in the name of revision described this freshwater shad as T. ilisha. Now let us see scientifically which name is valid for this fish.
The specific name of this fish ilisha was first proposed by Hamilton-Buchanan in 1822. Later on Cuvier in 1878 and Hamilton-Buchanan (1822) named it as Clupea ilisha. The fish was also named as Clupanodon ilisha by Lacepede (Hamilton-Buchanan, 1822). Regan (1917) found that this fish is different from other marine hilsas. So the generic names Clupea, and Clupanodon were retained for other marine fishes. He proposed the generic name Hilsa for this freshwater Gangetic shad. Fowler (1934) proposed the generic name for this fish as Tenualosa. Munro (1955) described the marine and freshwater hilsa fish of Ceylon as Tenualosa ilisha. Bhuiyan (1964) described this fish as Hilsa ilisha. He also mentioned in his book that Munro named this fish as Tenualosa ilisha collected from the marine and freshwater environment of Ceylon. Bhuiyan et al. (1992) described the fish as H. ilisha. All other authors of the sub continent such as Alikhunhi, Hora, Nazir Ahmed, Jhingran (1975), Rahman (1989), Talwar and Jhingran (1991) described the fish as Hilsa ilisha. Rahman (2005) in the revised edition of his book mentioned this fish as Tenualosa ilisha, probably following Whitehead (1965, 1985). The freshwater shad i.e. hilsa is spotless and the whole body is smooth while in Tenualosa there are 6-7 dorsolateral elongated spots (Fig-1). These two are distinct species. If Shafi and Quddus; Rahman and Whitehead want to accept this freshwater shad as Tenualosa by discarding Hilsa then what is the other fish for which this Hilsa name has been retained? Because the name Hilsa was first proposed by Regan in 1917 and Tenualosa by Fowler in 1934. So according to the law of priority the name Hilsa remains valid and Tenualosa is discardable since both these names are given to the same fish. I have collected few individuals of Tenualosa ilisha from Rajshahi fish market which were caught along with Hilsa ilisha. Probably these fishes migrated towards the north of the Bay of Bengal and caught along with H. ilisha.
Here I want to mention that our major carp rui was once named as Cyprinus rohita. But when it was found that Cyprinus is a distinct genus of European carp which is different from our rui fish so later on it was named as Labeo rohita. But Cyprinus genus was not discarded; it has been retained for the Euroean major carps. The genus Hilsa can not be discarded since it is not retained for other fish. The genus Tenualosa is to be discarded since it was proposed later by Fowler, Munro retained this genus for Srilankan ilish. He did not find any fish of the genus Hilsa in Sri Lanka. So in conclusion we should say that the scientific name of Tenualosa ilisha is the spotted Sri Lankan ilish. Bangladesh national fish ilish is Hilsa ilisha and not Tenualosa ilisha.
No comments:
Post a Comment